Evidence-Driven Hardware Engineering
Philosophy, core principles, and the operational framework for high-assurance electronic design without statistical trust.
Methodology & Research
Research & Specifications
Foundational methodologies, specifications, and whitepapers defining the OmeraCode design verification paradigm and physical engineering frameworks.
Foundational Documents
Human-in-the-loop is a release control, not a disclaimer
Why automated EDA tools should not use engineers as safety nets. Establishing clear systems-level boundaries and release checkpoints.
Why hardware AI needs evidence, not confidence
Generative AI excels at confidence, but hardware fails on assumptions. Why deterministic solvers and traceable checks must drive electronic design automation.
Methodologies
ClaimGuard Methodology
How OmeraCode's isolated audit suite extracts constraints, processes physical calculations, and handles review escalation loops.
Specifications
Evidence Pack Specification v1
Technical specification sheet for the OmeraCode Evidence Pack (.epk) directory structure, cryptographic manifests, and release gate verification.
Research Papers
Failure Modes in Hardware Reviews
An analysis of common design review failures in electronic systems—from requirements drift and component mismatch to thermal bottleneck loops.
Verification Benchmark Framework
A framework for measuring hardware validation quality. Defining metrics for traceability, constraint coverage, and review resolution rates.
What “verified” should mean in PCB automation
In the rush to automate board layouts, the word 'verified' has been diluted. Here is our definition: traceable parameters, math solvers, and cryptographically signed checks.